NEUROSCIENCE ON PHILOSOPHY

Over thepast two decades,neuroscience has profoundly changed how we understand learning, decision making, and self social connection. As a result, traditional philosophical questions about the mind and morals have been taken in new directions. The literature has distinguished "neuroscience philosophy" from

"neuroscience theory" for two decades. The former contains fundamental problems in neuroscience. The latter is about applying neurological concepts to traditional philosophical questions. Cognitive and computational neuroscience is directly occupying the issues traditionally addressed with in the humanities, including the nature of consciousnes, action, knowledge, andethics. 

Cellular, molecular, and behavioral neuroscience using animal models dominate the field of cognitive neurology. Philosophy, in its traditional guise, refers to questions that experimental science has not yet tapped into plausible explanatory theories. The dominant method of philosophy of mind and morality in the twentieth century is ideological analysis. Considered a philosophy unknown to scientific philosophers, ideological analysis reveals with in tent the unspoken truths of folk psychology.

The philosophy of neuroscience is the intermediate study of neuroscience and philosophy, which explores the relevance of neuroscience to arguments traditionally classified as the philosophy of the mind. Despite advances in behavior and brain science, moral philosophers in general have consistently reassured students that there is nothing to be learned from brain research in philosophical inquiry intovalues and moral rules. Moral philosophy is, at the very least, safe from neuroscience. The dominant method of philosophy of mind andmorality in the twentieth century isideological analysis. Considered a philosophy unknown to scientific philosophers, ideological analysis reveals with in tent the unspoken truths of folk psychology.

 Judging the community problems awesome complex Bussey-related facts are required, including news facts about cultural practices, about based on whatthe brain value is,and fact

predictions of consequences. Many methods and techniques central to neurological discovery rely on hypotheses that can control the interpretation of data. Classical “mind” questions include freedom, self, consciousness, how thoughts mean and “lack”, and how we learn and apply knowledge. All of these things are inter twined with questions about morality: where values come from, the roles of reason and emotion in choice and why responsibility and punishment.

Vintage mind/physical problem descartes' legacy: If the mind, as he thought, was a completely non -physical object, how could it communicate with the physical brain descartes' problem has disappeared because the weight of the evidence indicates that

mental processes are actually brain processes. The classical mind/body problem has been replaced with many questions: which brain mechanisms explain learning, decision making, self-deception and more. Being an alternative to the “mind-body

problem” is not an issue; This is an extensive research program of cognitive neuroscience.

Someexamplesforneurophilosophers:-Kathleen Atkins, Nayef Al-Rodhan, Ann-sophie, Barwhich, William Bechtel, Partricia Churchland, Paul Churchland, Andy Clark, Francis crick, Sam Harris, JessePrin.

In conclusion, the philosophy of neuroscience is the intermediate study of neuroscience and philosophy,which explores the relevance of neuroscience to arguments traditionally classified as the philosophy of the mind. The former contains fundamental problems in neuroscience. The latter is about applying neurological concepts to traditional philosophical questions.